LALBHAI MANGALDAS PATEL vs PATEL HARGOVANBHAI RAMDAS HATHIDAS Advocate - M S PRAJAPATI — 50/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: GJGN010018622025

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

51/2025

Filing Date

16-05-2025

Registration No

50/2025

Registration Date

16-05-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 96,O41,
IA/1/2026 Classification : INTERIM APPLICATION Section LALBHAI MANGALDAS PATELPATEL HARGOVANBHAI RAMDAS HATHIDAS

Petitioner(s)

LALBHAI MANGALDAS PATEL

Adv. B B NAYAK

Respondent(s)

PATEL HARGOVANBHAI RAMDAS HATHIDAS Advocate - M S PRAJAPATI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

06-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

31-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
ORDER

SUMMARY: The appellate court allowed the stay application and stayed the implementation of the trial court's judgment dismissing the specific performance suit dated 01.05.2025. The court found the appellant (original plaintiff) had a prima facie case, would suffer irreparable loss if the property was alienated, and balance of convenience favored granting stay. Respondents are temporarily restrained from creating third-party rights in the disputed property pending final disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The appellate court allowed the stay application and stayed the implementation of the trial court's judgment dismissing the specific performance suit dated 01.05.2025. The court found the appellant (original plaintiff) had a prima facie case, would suffer irreparable loss if the property was alienated, and balance of convenience favored granting stay. Respondents are temporarily restrained from creating third-party rights in the disputed property pending final disposal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case