ANILKUMAR RAYMALBHAI VAGHARI DEVIPUJAK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 401/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010009262026

Case disposed

Filing Number

399/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

401/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11216004250512

Police Station

DABHODA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 103(1),137(2),238A
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

ANILKUMAR RAYMALBHAI VAGHARI DEVIPUJAK

Adv. K R SHARMA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

ORDER

13-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of CRMA No. 401/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Anilkumar Raymalbhai Vaghari's plea for regular bail in a murder case involving the death of a 9-year-11-month-old child. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioner deliberately kidnapped the victim, caused fatal injuries, disposed of the body, and attempted to destroy evidence by involving another person. Applying legal precedent, the court held that regular bail cannot be granted in such grave circumstances where the crime is serious, the victim is a minor, and evidence of conspiracy exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMA No. 401/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Anilkumar Raymalbhai Vaghari's plea for regular bail in a murder case involving the death of a 9-year-11-month-old child. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioner deliberately kidnapped the victim, caused fatal injuries, disposed of the body, and attempted to destroy evidence by involving another person. Applying legal precedent, the court held that regular bail cannot be granted in such grave circumstances where the crime is serious, the victim is a minor, and evidence of conspiracy exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case