ANILKUMAR RAYMALBHAI VAGHARI DEVIPUJAK vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 401/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010009262026
Filing Number
399/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
401/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11216004250512
Police Station
DABHODA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANILKUMAR RAYMALBHAI VAGHARI DEVIPUJAK
Adv. K R SHARMA
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 2-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of CRMA No. 401/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Anilkumar Raymalbhai Vaghari's plea for regular bail in a murder case involving the death of a 9-year-11-month-old child. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioner deliberately kidnapped the victim, caused fatal injuries, disposed of the body, and attempted to destroy evidence by involving another person. Applying legal precedent, the court held that regular bail cannot be granted in such grave circumstances where the crime is serious, the victim is a minor, and evidence of conspiracy exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRMA No. 401/2026 The court rejected the petitioner Anilkumar Raymalbhai Vaghari's plea for regular bail in a murder case involving the death of a 9-year-11-month-old child. The court found prima facie evidence that the petitioner deliberately kidnapped the victim, caused fatal injuries, disposed of the body, and attempted to destroy evidence by involving another person. Applying legal precedent, the court held that regular bail cannot be granted in such grave circumstances where the crime is serious, the victim is a minor, and evidence of conspiracy exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts