VIPULBHAI BABUBHAI DESAI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 397/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010009062026

Filing Number

395/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

397/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

ACB POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 Section 7,12,13(1),13(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIPULBHAI BABUBHAI DESAI

    Adv. D J SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA No. 397/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar granted the petitioner's application and ordered release of regular bail for land-related charges under IPC Sections 7, 12, 13(1), and 13(2) and Indian Penal Code Section 343. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioner faced serious accusations of demanding illegal gratification (₹3 crores) while serving as an armed police constable, and later receiving ₹30 lakhs through coercion, the investigation was largely complete with a charge sheet filed. Applying the *Anilkumar Yadav v. State of Delhi* precedent, the court determined that regular bail was justified as the petitioner had strong prima facie defenses and no grounds existed to believe he would obstruct justice or abscond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 397/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA No. 397/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar granted the petitioner's application and ordered release of regular bail for land-related charges under IPC Sections 7, 12, 13(1), and 13(2) and Indian Penal Code Section 343. Key Reasoning: The court found that while the petitioner faced serious accusations of demanding illegal gratification (₹3 crores) while serving as an armed police constable, and later receiving ₹30 lakhs through coercion, the investigation was largely complete with a charge sheet filed. Applying the *Anilkumar Yadav v. State of Delhi* precedent, the court determined that regular bail was justified as the petitioner had strong prima facie defenses and no grounds existed to believe he would obstruct justice or abscond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case