KRUPALKUMAR HARESHBHAI JOGI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 372/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010008352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
370/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
372/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
4-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
MANSA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRUPALKUMAR HARESHBHAI JOGI
Adv. M V CHAUDHARI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 4-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, granted bail to the applicant in Criminal Misc. Application No. 372/2026 in a theft case (Section 379 IPC). The court found that the seized gold ornaments (gold chain and bracelet) allegedly belonged to the applicant, not the actual theft victim, and the accused had not claimed the seized items despite police custody since 2014. The court imposed conditions including a bail bond of ₹1,45,000, quarterly court verification of the ornaments, and the applicant's presence as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, granted bail to the applicant in Criminal Misc. Application No. 372/2026 in a theft case (Section 379 IPC). The court found that the seized gold ornaments (gold chain and bracelet) allegedly belonged to the applicant, not the actual theft victim, and the accused had not claimed the seized items despite police custody since 2014. The court imposed conditions including a bail bond of ₹1,45,000, quarterly court verification of the ornaments, and the applicant's presence as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts