ISMAILBHAI BADUBHAI PARMAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 366/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010008152026
Filing Number
364/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
366/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
4-6th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11216005250816
Police Station
DAHEGAM POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ISMAILBHAI BADUBHAI PARMAR
Adv. G K BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, rejected the applicant's bail plea under BNS Section 482. The court found substantial evidence of the applicant's involvement in a communal violence incident on September 24, 2025, in Bahiyali village where approximately 200 people committed arson, damaged property worth ₹76 lakh, and attacked police and fire brigade personnel. The court determined the applicant's guilt was established during investigation and bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
6th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 366/2026
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Gandhinagar, rejected the applicant's bail plea under BNS Section 482. The court found substantial evidence of the applicant's involvement in a communal violence incident on September 24, 2025, in Bahiyali village where approximately 200 people committed arson, damaged property worth ₹76 lakh, and attacked police and fire brigade personnel. The court determined the applicant's guilt was established during investigation and bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts