MOHAMMED MOHSIN IQBALBHAI KUWAWALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 363/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010008102026

Filing Number

361/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

363/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

2-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8C,20B(II)C,29,31

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED MOHSIN IQBALBHAI KUWAWALA

    Adv. I Z MANSURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Mohammed Mohsin Iqbalbhai Kuwawala, who was arrested for NDPS Act violations including possession of 10.556 kg of charas (hashish). The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's deep involvement in drug trafficking conspiracy with family members, determined that mandatory bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied, and concluded that releasing him could result in evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Mohammed Mohsin Iqbalbhai Kuwawala, who was arrested for NDPS Act violations including possession of 10.556 kg of charas (hashish). The judge found prima facie evidence of the applicant's deep involvement in drug trafficking conspiracy with family members, determined that mandatory bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not satisfied, and concluded that releasing him could result in evidence tampering and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case