SURVIRSINH KISHORSINH RAJPUT vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S S PANDYA — 59/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJGN010007972026
Filing Number
59/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
59/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURVIRSINH KISHORSINH RAJPUT
Adv. S K RAVAT
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - S S PANDYA
SANDESH DHANPALSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. S M PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 59/2026 The Sessions Court at Gandhinagar disposed of the criminal appeal as "compromised" after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement regarding a disputed cheque case. The court acquitted appellant Survirsinh Kishorsinh Rajput of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the trial court's conviction dated 24.09.2025, relying on Section 147 of the NI Act which permits compounding of offences. No costs or fines were imposed per Supreme Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Appeal No. 59/2026 The Sessions Court at Gandhinagar disposed of the criminal appeal as "compromised" after both parties reached an out-of-court settlement regarding a disputed cheque case. The court acquitted appellant Survirsinh Kishorsinh Rajput of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed the trial court's conviction dated 24.09.2025, relying on Section 147 of the NI Act which permits compounding of offences. No costs or fines were imposed per Supreme Court guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts