VISHNUKUMAR SON OF RAMAVATAR GURJAR PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 350/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJGN010007732026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
348/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
350/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR
Judge
4-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VISHNUKUMAR SON OF RAMAVATAR GURJAR PATEL
Adv. H H DAVE
SHER SINGH SON OF HETRAMSINGH GURJAR
Adv. H H DAVE
MADHAV RAO LAXMANSINGH GURJAR
Adv. H H DAVE
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 4-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMA 350-2026 Decision: The court granted bail to three accused persons (Vishnukumar, Shersing, and Madhav Laxman Singh) on charges of cyberfraud involving fake hotel websites and unauthorized bookings through the Somnath Trust's name. Each accused was released on bail of ₹50,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, surrendering identity documents, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. Key Reasoning: The court found the accused's conduct constituted serious cybercrimes (IPC sections 420, 406, 468, 471, 61(2), and IT Act section 66), but granted bail considering their young age, lack of prior criminal records, and the principle of proportionality in bail conditions balancing public interest with individual liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMA 350-2026 Decision: The court granted bail to three accused persons (Vishnukumar, Shersing, and Madhav Laxman Singh) on charges of cyberfraud involving fake hotel websites and unauthorized bookings through the Somnath Trust's name. Each accused was released on bail of ₹50,000 with conditions including monthly police reporting, surrendering identity documents, and restrictions on leaving India without court permission. Key Reasoning: The court found the accused's conduct constituted serious cybercrimes (IPC sections 420, 406, 468, 471, 61(2), and IT Act section 66), but granted bail considering their young age, lack of prior criminal records, and the principle of proportionality in bail conditions balancing public interest with individual liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts