HIRAL SATISHCHANDRA KANSARA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP — 343/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJGN010007622026

Filing Number

341/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

343/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(2),318(4),319(2),61(2)
The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 Section 66D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRAL SATISHCHANDRA KANSARA

    Adv. P J MISTRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gandhinagar granted regular bail to the accused under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), and ITA Section 66(D), ordering release on regular bail in a case involving alleged online trading fraud and financial misconduct. The court found that while serious charges exist, the investigation status, lack of conclusive evidence linking the accused to proceeds of crime, and absence of imminent flight risk warranted bail with appropriate conditions rather than continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gandhinagar granted regular bail to the accused under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2), and ITA Section 66(D), ordering release on regular bail in a case involving alleged online trading fraud and financial misconduct. The court found that while serious charges exist, the investigation status, lack of conclusive evidence linking the accused to proceeds of crime, and absence of imminent flight risk warranted bail with appropriate conditions rather than continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case