Government of Gujarat vs DHARMENDRAKUMAR ALIAS VIVEK S/O BANGALIBABU DIVAKAR (DHOBI) Advocate - J K YADAV — 19/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,397. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJGN010007272024

Filing Number

19/2024

Filing Date

21-Feb-2024

Registration No

19/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, GANDHINAGAR

Judge

3-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11216004230480

Police Station

DABHODA POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395,397
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. P D VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARMENDRAKUMAR ALIAS VIVEK S/O BANGALIBABU DIVAKAR (DHOBI) Advocate - J K YADAV

  2. 2.SATENDRASINH ALIAS SATTE S/O LALSINH BADANSINH DIVAKAR (DHOBI)

    Adv. J K YADAV

  3. 3.DINESHSINH S/O RAMBARAN RAMESHWAR KUSHVA

    Adv. J M VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Judgment The 3rd Additional Sessions Court of Gandhinagar acquitted all three accused under Indian Penal Code Sections 354, 357, and IPC Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the accuseds' clear identification or their specific involvement in the alleged robbery and criminal intimidation incident, as the prosecution witnesses could not provide unambiguous identification of the perpetrators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    3rd Addl District Judge

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  12. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 12-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  24. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    2nd Addl District Judge

  25. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  26. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 11-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  31. 13-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 23-Jul-2024

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 18-Jun-2024

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 06-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  35. 29-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  36. 21-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 21-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment The 3rd Additional Sessions Court of Gandhinagar acquitted all three accused under Indian Penal Code Sections 354, 357, and IPC Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the accuseds' clear identification or their specific involvement in the alleged robbery and criminal intimidation incident, as the prosecution witnesses could not provide unambiguous identification of the perpetrators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case