VALIBEN DADUBHAI AMBALIYA vs NOT APPLICABLE — 35/2025

Case under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 29. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJDW080008552025

Filing Number

35/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

ADDL. COURT-DWARKA

Judge

1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 29
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VALIBEN DADUBHAI AMBALIYA

    Adv. R K VADHER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NOT APPLICABLE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional District Judge of Devbhoomi Dwarka granted Valiben Dadubhai Ambaliya permission to sell the minor children's undivided share in ancestral agricultural property for their maintenance and education, without requiring formal court appointment as guardian. The court directed that proceeds be invested in a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank in joint names, with funds used solely for the minors' welfare until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge of Devbhoomi Dwarka granted Valiben Dadubhai Ambaliya permission to sell the minor children's undivided share in ancestral agricultural property for their maintenance and education, without requiring formal court appointment as guardian. The court directed that proceeds be invested in a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank in joint names, with funds used solely for the minors' welfare until they attain majority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case