VIRUBEN PETHABHAI KANJARIYA vs DEEPAK OMPRAKASH DRIVER AND OWNER — 25/2025
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJDW080007302025
Filing Number
25/2025
Filing Date
17-09-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
17-09-2025
Court
ADDL. COURT-DWARKA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIRUBEN PETHABHAI KANJARIYA
Adv. K P PARMAR
Respondent(s)
DEEPAK OMPRAKASH DRIVER AND OWNER
GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE LTD
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 12-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 20-01-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: MACMA No. 25/2025 The Additional District Judge, Devbhoomi Dwarka allowed the applicant Viruben Pethabhai Kanjariya's application for condonation of delay in filing a motor accident claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The applicant's husband died from injuries sustained in a vehicular accident on 11.01.2025, and she filed the claim petition 3 months and 7 days late due to mental distress and farming commitments. The court, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent, held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to motor accident claims despite the six-month statutory limit in Section 166(3), as the legislature did not expressly exclude its applicability. The delay was condoned and the petition was directed to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MACMA No. 25/2025 The Additional District Judge, Devbhoomi Dwarka allowed the applicant Viruben Pethabhai Kanjariya's application for condonation of delay in filing a motor accident claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. The applicant's husband died from injuries sustained in a vehicular accident on 11.01.2025, and she filed the claim petition 3 months and 7 days late due to mental distress and farming commitments. The court, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent, held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act applies to motor accident claims despite the six-month statutory limit in Section 166(3), as the legislature did not expressly exclude its applicability. The delay was condoned and the petition was directed to be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts