PRUTHVIRAJSINH ALIAS RUSHIYO ALIAS RUSHIRAJSINH KARUBHA VADHER vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 41/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJDW080001672026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
ADDL. COURT-DWARKA
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185005260218
Police Station
MITHAPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRUTHVIRAJSINH ALIAS RUSHIYO ALIAS RUSHIRAJSINH KARUBHA VADHER
Adv. J N PARMAR
Respondent(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CrMA-41/2026 The court granted regular bail to Pruthvirajsinh Karubha Vadher, accused of offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1951 (Sections 65(E), 116-B, 98(2)). The judge found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the applicant's lack of serious criminal antecedents, strong family and social roots, and the nature of his alleged role in the offence. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, cooperation with investigation, passport deposit, regular court attendance, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CrMA-41/2026 The court granted regular bail to Pruthvirajsinh Karubha Vadher, accused of offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1951 (Sections 65(E), 116-B, 98(2)). The judge found that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given the applicant's lack of serious criminal antecedents, strong family and social roots, and the nature of his alleged role in the offence. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety of equal amount, cooperation with investigation, passport deposit, regular court attendance, and prohibition on leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts