RIYABEN ALIAS KITU PREMBHAI SHARMA vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 40/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJDW080001662026

Case disposed

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-DWARKA

Judge

1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185003260252

Police Station

KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

RIYABEN ALIAS KITU PREMBHAI SHARMA

Adv. P K SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CrMA-40/2026 The court granted regular bail to Riyaben @ Kitu Prembhai Sharma, accused of abetting child kidnapping under BNS sections 137(2), 87 and POCSO Act section 12. The judge found bail appropriate because the accused had no serious criminal record, investigation was nearly complete, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and she had strong ties to Rajkot as a permanent resident, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception." She was released on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with witnesses, surrender of passport, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CrMA-40/2026 The court granted regular bail to Riyaben @ Kitu Prembhai Sharma, accused of abetting child kidnapping under BNS sections 137(2), 87 and POCSO Act section 12. The judge found bail appropriate because the accused had no serious criminal record, investigation was nearly complete, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and she had strong ties to Rajkot as a permanent resident, applying the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception." She was released on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with one surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including non-contact with witnesses, surrender of passport, and prohibition from leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. COURT-DWARKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case