VISVASBHAI RAMABHAI BHADRAKA vs GAGLIYA SHYAMBHAI LAKHMANBHAI — 1350/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW060016712025

Filing Number

1350/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

1350/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISVASBHAI RAMABHAI BHADRAKA

    Adv. R C JADEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAGLIYA SHYAMBHAI LAKHMANBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court held that the defendant failed to complete the prescribed procedure and rejected the defendant's plea, finding that since the defendant did not follow proper legal process, the case cannot proceed further on that basis. The court ordered that the case be decided based on the merits of the petition filed by the plaintiff, dated March 14, 2026, at the Bhanavad District Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1350/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court held that the defendant failed to complete the prescribed procedure and rejected the defendant's plea, finding that since the defendant did not follow proper legal process, the case cannot proceed further on that basis. The court ordered that the case be decided based on the merits of the petition filed by the plaintiff, dated March 14, 2026, at the Bhanavad District Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case