PGVCL vs NARSHIBHAI GOVABHAI MAKVANA Advocate - EX — 69/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 13th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW060011152024
Filing Number
69/2024
Filing Date
02-Aug-2024
Registration No
69/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL
Adv. M T NANAVATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.NARSHIBHAI GOVABHAI MAKVANA Advocate - EX
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 69/2024 Petitioner: PGVCL (Paschim Gujarat Bijli Company Limited) Respondent: Narshibhai Govabhai Makvana Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court found the respondent guilty of illegally tapping into the power line at his residence in Jampur village, Bhavnagar taluka, and ordered him to pay Rs. 25,153.05 with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment. The court also directed the respondent to reimburse PGVCL's expenses and comply with the judgment, while declining PGVCL's request for 15% interest as no contractual agreement existed between the parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2024
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2024
Case Summary: 69/2024 Petitioner: PGVCL (Paschim Gujarat Bijli Company Limited) Respondent: Narshibhai Govabhai Makvana Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court found the respondent guilty of illegally tapping into the power line at his residence in Jampur village, Bhavnagar taluka, and ordered him to pay Rs. 25,153.05 with 6% annual interest from the date of the claim until payment. The court also directed the respondent to reimburse PGVCL's expenses and comply with the judgment, while declining PGVCL's request for 15% interest as no contractual agreement existed between the parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts