PGVCL vs JAYSUKHBHAI RAJSHIBHAI NANERA — 59/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW060010032024

Filing Number

59/2024

Filing Date

28-Jun-2024

Registration No

59/2024

Registration Date

28-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYSUKHBHAI RAJSHIBHAI NANERA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jaysukhbhai Rajshibhai Nanera (59/2024) The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft case against the respondent. The respondent was caught using unauthorized electrical connections and stealing power worth ₹18,249-58 paise. The court found the respondent liable and ordered payment of the stolen electricity amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, rejecting PGVCL's demand for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 12-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 01-Jul-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 10-Jun-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 09-May-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 15-Apr-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 08-Mar-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 28-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 17-Feb-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Jan-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 30-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 14-Dec-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 30-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 04-Nov-2024

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 14-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 14-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 23-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 29-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 12-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 28-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 28-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jaysukhbhai Rajshibhai Nanera (59/2024) The court partially allowed PGVCL's electricity theft case against the respondent. The respondent was caught using unauthorized electrical connections and stealing power worth ₹18,249-58 paise. The court found the respondent liable and ordered payment of the stolen electricity amount plus 6% annual interest from the claim date until recovery, rejecting PGVCL's demand for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case