PGVCL vs SAGTHIYA JYOTSHNABEN HITESHBHAI Advocate - G A VAGHELA — 58/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW060010022024

Case disposed

Filing Number

58/2024

Filing Date

28-06-2024

Registration No

58/2024

Registration Date

28-06-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL

Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

SAGTHIYA JYOTSHNABEN HITESHBHAI Advocate - G A VAGHELA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

05-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

01-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sagthiya Jyotshnaben Hiteshbhai (58/2024) Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 2,20,552-32 (outstanding electricity charges) with 6% annual interest from the claim filing date until full payment, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional charges and 15% interest. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent, a former consumer with connection number 32(801/12050/2), had illegally used electricity for residential purposes and failed to pay bills despite receiving notices. The court applied statutory provisions rather than contractual interest rates, determining that 6% interest was appropriate under law since no valid agreement existed between the parties regarding interest terms on electricity dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sagthiya Jyotshnaben Hiteshbhai (58/2024) Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 2,20,552-32 (outstanding electricity charges) with 6% annual interest from the claim filing date until full payment, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional charges and 15% interest. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent, a former consumer with connection number 32(801/12050/2), had illegally used electricity for residential purposes and failed to pay bills despite receiving notices. The court applied statutory provisions rather than contractual interest rates, determining that 6% interest was appropriate under law since no valid agreement existed between the parties regarding interest terms on electricity dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case