PGVCL vs SAGTHIYA JYOTSHNABEN HITESHBHAI Advocate - G A VAGHELA — 58/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW060010022024
Filing Number
58/2024
Filing Date
28-Jun-2024
Registration No
58/2024
Registration Date
28-Jun-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL
Adv. M T NANAVATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAGTHIYA JYOTSHNABEN HITESHBHAI Advocate - G A VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sagthiya Jyotshnaben Hiteshbhai (58/2024) Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 2,20,552-32 (outstanding electricity charges) with 6% annual interest from the claim filing date until full payment, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional charges and 15% interest. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent, a former consumer with connection number 32(801/12050/2), had illegally used electricity for residential purposes and failed to pay bills despite receiving notices. The court applied statutory provisions rather than contractual interest rates, determining that 6% interest was appropriate under law since no valid agreement existed between the parties regarding interest terms on electricity dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Aug-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jul-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2024
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Sagthiya Jyotshnaben Hiteshbhai (58/2024) Decision: The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim against the respondent for electricity theft and unpaid bills. The court ordered the respondent to pay Rs. 2,20,552-32 (outstanding electricity charges) with 6% annual interest from the claim filing date until full payment, while rejecting the petitioner's claim for additional charges and 15% interest. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent, a former consumer with connection number 32(801/12050/2), had illegally used electricity for residential purposes and failed to pay bills despite receiving notices. The court applied statutory provisions rather than contractual interest rates, determining that 6% interest was appropriate under law since no valid agreement existed between the parties regarding interest terms on electricity dues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts