PGVCL vs DAYBEN KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - EX — 53/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 13th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW060009842024
Filing Number
53/2024
Filing Date
25-06-2024
Registration No
53/2024
Registration Date
25-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL
Adv. M T NANAVATI
Respondent(s)
DAYBEN KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - EX
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 31-12-2025 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 53/2024 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against respondent Dayben Kantibhai Parmar for recovery of unpaid electricity charges of ₹4,930.65 plus interest. The court found the respondent was a defaulting consumer and held him liable for the outstanding dues, awarding 6% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, while declining the petitioner's claim for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 53/2024 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against respondent Dayben Kantibhai Parmar for recovery of unpaid electricity charges of ₹4,930.65 plus interest. The court found the respondent was a defaulting consumer and held him liable for the outstanding dues, awarding 6% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, while declining the petitioner's claim for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts