PGVCL vs DAYBEN KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - EX — 53/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW060009842024

Filing Number

53/2024

Filing Date

25-Jun-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

25-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYBEN KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - EX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case 53/2024 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against respondent Dayben Kantibhai Parmar for recovery of unpaid electricity charges of ₹4,930.65 plus interest. The court found the respondent was a defaulting consumer and held him liable for the outstanding dues, awarding 6% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, while declining the petitioner's claim for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 30-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 18-Aug-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 12-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 09-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 03-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 14-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 30-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 04-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 14-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 14-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 17-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 22-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 25-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 25-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 53/2024 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against respondent Dayben Kantibhai Parmar for recovery of unpaid electricity charges of ₹4,930.65 plus interest. The court found the respondent was a defaulting consumer and held him liable for the outstanding dues, awarding 6% annual interest from the date of the suit until payment, while declining the petitioner's claim for 15% interest due to lack of contractual agreement between parties on that rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case