PGVCL vs HEIRS OF LAKHMAN KARA SHAMLA ARJAN LAKHMAN SHAMLA — 48/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 01st May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW060008402024
Filing Number
48/2024
Filing Date
15-06-2024
Registration No
48/2024
Registration Date
15-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL
Adv. M T NANAVATI
Respondent(s)
HEIRS OF LAKHMAN KARA SHAMLA ARJAN LAKHMAN SHAMLA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 14-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 48/2024 - PGVCL v. Heirs of Lakhman Kara Shamla The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for outstanding electricity dues against the respondents (heirs of Lakhman Shamla). The court found the respondents liable to pay Rs. 43,341.09 with 6% annual interest from the date of the bill until payment, rejecting the company's claim for 15% interest. The court held that where no contractual interest rate exists between parties, the statutory rate applies, and ordered the respondents to pay dues while directing PGVCL to reconnect the electricity supply upon payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 48/2024 - PGVCL v. Heirs of Lakhman Kara Shamla The court partially allowed PGVCL's claim for outstanding electricity dues against the respondents (heirs of Lakhman Shamla). The court found the respondents liable to pay Rs. 43,341.09 with 6% annual interest from the date of the bill until payment, rejecting the company's claim for 15% interest. The court held that where no contractual interest rate exists between parties, the statutory rate applies, and ordered the respondents to pay dues while directing PGVCL to reconnect the electricity supply upon payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts