PGVCL vs BHARATBHAI LAKHAMNBHAI PARMAR — 28/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW060008342025
Filing Number
28/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL
Adv. M T NANAVATI
Respondent(s)
BHARATBHAI LAKHAMNBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: 28/2025 - PGVCL v. BHARATBHAI LAKHAMNBHAI PARMAR The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner Power Distribution Company) electricity bill recovery petition against respondent Bharatbhai Parmar. The respondent had defaulted on paying electricity bills totaling ₹6,222 and failed to respond to payment notices. The court directed the respondent to pay ₹6,222 at 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment, with the provision that if contractual terms exist between parties regarding interest rates, such terms would apply. The court imposed costs on the respondent and ordered compliance within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 28/2025 - PGVCL v. BHARATBHAI LAKHAMNBHAI PARMAR The court partially allowed PGVCL's (Petitioner Power Distribution Company) electricity bill recovery petition against respondent Bharatbhai Parmar. The respondent had defaulted on paying electricity bills totaling ₹6,222 and failed to respond to payment notices. The court directed the respondent to pay ₹6,222 at 6% annual interest from the bill date until payment, with the provision that if contractual terms exist between parties regarding interest rates, such terms would apply. The court imposed costs on the respondent and ordered compliance within the stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts