PGVCL vs JYOTSANABEN W/O HITESHBHAI SAGATHIYA — 9/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW060001732025

Filing Number

9/2025

Filing Date

17-Feb-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

17-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL

    Adv. M T NANAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JYOTSANABEN W/O HITESHBHAI SAGATHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jyotsanaben W/O Hiteshbhai Sagathiya (Case 9/2025) The court found the respondent guilty of electricity theft. The respondent illegally connected a power line to her residential building in Bhangvad, Devbhumi, drawing 2,454 watts of unauthorized electricity without proper metering. Upon inspection on 13/08/2024, authorities discovered the illegal connection and seized approximately 20 meters of cable. The court partially allowed the utility company's claim, directing the respondent to pay Rs. 1,30,243.31 plus 6% annual interest from the complaint date until full payment, along with legal costs. The respondent must also bear the company's case expenses and comply with the judgment within the specified timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 01-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 01-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 13-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 11-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 12-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 05-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 21-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 24-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 17-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 17-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL v. Jyotsanaben W/O Hiteshbhai Sagathiya (Case 9/2025) The court found the respondent guilty of electricity theft. The respondent illegally connected a power line to her residential building in Bhangvad, Devbhumi, drawing 2,454 watts of unauthorized electricity without proper metering. Upon inspection on 13/08/2024, authorities discovered the illegal connection and seized approximately 20 meters of cable. The court partially allowed the utility company's claim, directing the respondent to pay Rs. 1,30,243.31 plus 6% annual interest from the complaint date until full payment, along with legal costs. The respondent must also bear the company's case expenses and comply with the judgment within the specified timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case