HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI vs HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 96/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW060001572025

Filing Number

96/2025

Filing Date

12-Feb-2025

Registration No

96/2025

Registration Date

12-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI

    Adv. N M MAKVANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 01-Oct-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 25-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 18-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 31-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 14-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 01-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 17-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 05-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 08-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 01-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 12-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 96/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case