HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI vs HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 96/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW060001572025
Filing Number
96/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI
Adv. N M MAKVANA
Respondent(s)
HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 14-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts