HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI vs HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 96/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW060001572025
Filing Number
96/2025
Filing Date
12-Feb-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
12-Feb-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI
Adv. N M MAKVANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 96/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was presented within validity, a written demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and payment was not made within 15 days of notice. The accused raised no credible defense against the legal presumptions favoring the complainant. Sentence: One year imprisonment and ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, with additional three months imprisonment if compensation remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts