HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI vs HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 95/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW060001562025
Filing Number
95/2025
Filing Date
12-Feb-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
12-Feb-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI
Adv. N M MAKVANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 95/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Bhanvad convicted the accused (Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that the accused drew a cheque that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving a demand notice, and provided no credible defense to rebut the statutory presumption of debt. Sentencing: One year simple imprisonment, ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, and forfeiture of property/bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 95/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 95/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Bhanvad convicted the accused (Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that the accused drew a cheque that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving a demand notice, and provided no credible defense to rebut the statutory presumption of debt. Sentencing: One year simple imprisonment, ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, and forfeiture of property/bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts