HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI vs HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 95/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 05th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW060001562025
Filing Number
95/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
95/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HITESHBHAI MAGANLAL JOSHI
Adv. N M MAKVANA
Respondent(s)
HARDIKBHAI NITINBHAI PATANI Advocate - G N SORTHIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 14-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 95/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Bhanvad convicted the accused (Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that the accused drew a cheque that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving a demand notice, and provided no credible defense to rebut the statutory presumption of debt. Sentencing: One year simple imprisonment, ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, and forfeiture of property/bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 95/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Bhanvad convicted the accused (Hardikbhai Nitinbhai Patani) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹2,00,000. The court found that the accused drew a cheque that was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds, failed to make payment within 15 days of receiving a demand notice, and provided no credible defense to rebut the statutory presumption of debt. Sentencing: One year simple imprisonment, ₹2,00,000 compensation to the complainant, and forfeiture of property/bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts