GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs PRAVINBHAI MERAMANBHAI RAVLIYA Advocate - G N SORTHIA — 52/2026
Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW060000842026
Filing Number
52/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHANVAD
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185001250128
Police Station
BHANVAD POLICE STATION - DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAVINBHAI MERAMANBHAI RAVLIYA Advocate - G N SORTHIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 52/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Pravinbhai Meramanbhai Ravliya The court found the accused guilty of illegal possession of a country-made firearm under IPC Section 25(1-B) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment plus a fine of ₹15,000. The court rejected the accused's claims of procedural irregularities, finding the prosecution's evidence credible and the arrest lawful despite lacking prior authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2026
Case Summary: 52/2026 - Government of Gujarat v. Pravinbhai Meramanbhai Ravliya The court found the accused guilty of illegal possession of a country-made firearm under IPC Section 25(1-B) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment plus a fine of ₹15,000. The court rejected the accused's claims of procedural irregularities, finding the prosecution's evidence credible and the arrest lawful despite lacking prior authorization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts