Government of Gujarat vs MOHMMADUMAR SULTAN ALI MALEK Advocate - M H SOLANKI — 953/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW050012832025
Filing Number
953/2025
Filing Date
25-08-2025
Registration No
953/2025
Registration Date
25-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DWARKA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185002250729
Police Station
DWARKA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MOHMMADUMAR SULTAN ALI MALEK Advocate - M H SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 05-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 953/2025 The court acquitted the accused (Mohammad Umar Sultan Ali Malik) of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54, finding insufficient evidence that he stole the motorcycle in question. While the prosecution established that a motorcycle was stolen from Varwala on 14/05/2025, it failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the theft, as the complainant could not identify who actually stole the vehicle and the investigation lacked corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 953/2025 The court acquitted the accused (Mohammad Umar Sultan Ali Malik) of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54, finding insufficient evidence that he stole the motorcycle in question. While the prosecution established that a motorcycle was stolen from Varwala on 14/05/2025, it failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the theft, as the complainant could not identify who actually stole the vehicle and the investigation lacked corroborating evidence linking the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts