VACHCHHRAJ PETROLEUM BEHALF PROPRIETOR OF - RAJSHIBHAI RANABHAI CHANCHIYA vs MAMADBHAI KAMUBHAI LOTHIYA Advocate - A B PATEL — 410/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW050006152024

Filing Number

410/2024

Filing Date

04-Apr-2024

Registration No

410/2024

Registration Date

04-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, DWARKA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VACHCHHRAJ PETROLEUM BEHALF PROPRIETOR OF - RAJSHIBHAI RANABHAI CHANCHIYA

    Adv. M H SOLANKI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMADBHAI KAMUBHAI LOTHIYA Advocate - A B PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dwarka acquitted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, finding that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued for discharging a legally existing debt. The court determined that the cheque (Rs. 4,00,000) was merely security for potential future liabilities rather than payment of an actual debt, as the complainant had not provided documentary evidence of goods supplied on credit before the cheque was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 17-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 30-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 20-Jul-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  27. 29-Jun-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  28. 04-Jun-2024

    Plea

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  29. 10-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 04-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 410/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Dwarka acquitted the accused under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138, finding that the complainant failed to prove the cheque was issued for discharging a legally existing debt. The court determined that the cheque (Rs. 4,00,000) was merely security for potential future liabilities rather than payment of an actual debt, as the complainant had not provided documentary evidence of goods supplied on credit before the cheque was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case