STATE OF GUJARAT vs KARSHANBHA AMARSANGBHA SUMANIYA Advocate - R N THAKAR-G/4462/2019 — 1362/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW040015522025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1362/2025
Filing Date
22-08-2025
Registration No
1362/2025
Registration Date
22-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, OKHAMANDAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185005250643
Police Station
MITHAPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KARSHANBHA AMARSANGBHA SUMANIYA Advocate - R N THAKAR-G/4462/2019
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused Karsnbha Amarsangbha Sumraniya of charges under IPC Section 135(1) for allegedly damaging a boundary wall. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses provided insufficient corroborating evidence and the alleged stolen property was not recovered, making the direct evidence against the accused unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted the accused Karsnbha Amarsangbha Sumraniya of charges under IPC Section 135(1) for allegedly damaging a boundary wall. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses provided insufficient corroborating evidence and the alleged stolen property was not recovered, making the direct evidence against the accused unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts