PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY(P.G.V.C.L.) THROUGH ITS DEPUTY ENGNEER, BHATIYA SUB DIVISION vs ARAJANBHAI PUNJABHAI MAKAVANA — 58/2025

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW030021072025

Filing Number

58/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

58/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALA

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY(P.G.V.C.L.) THROUGH ITS DEPUTY ENGNEER, BHATIYA SUB DIVISION

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARAJANBHAI PUNJABHAI MAKAVANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the civil suit filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company (PGVCL) against Arajanbhai Punjabhai Makavana, finding that the dispute had been settled through lok adalat (public court) proceedings, thereby rendering the claim without legal foundation. The court ordered refund of court fees to the petitioner and closed the case, as no valid cause of action remained following the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 58/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the civil suit filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company (PGVCL) against Arajanbhai Punjabhai Makavana, finding that the dispute had been settled through lok adalat (public court) proceedings, thereby rendering the claim without legal foundation. The court ordered refund of court fees to the petitioner and closed the case, as no valid cause of action remained following the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case