Government of Gujarat vs RANMAL JIVAN JAM Advocate - S K BELA — 1414/2024

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 06th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW030016372024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1414/2024

Filing Date

07-11-2024

Registration No

1414/2024

Registration Date

07-11-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA

FIR Details

FIR Number

30158

Police Station

KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

ARMS ACT Section 25(1-B)A

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RANMAL JIVAN JAM Advocate - S K BELA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

15-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

04-12-2025

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: C.C. No. 1414/2024 Court Decision: The accused was acquitted of charges under Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a country-made firearm. The court found insufficient credible evidence—witness testimonies were inconsistent, the seized weapon's chain of custody was questionable, and no independent witness corroborated the alleged discovery. The firearm could not be conclusively proven to have been in the accused's possession or control at the time of seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C. No. 1414/2024 Court Decision: The accused was acquitted of charges under Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a country-made firearm. The court found insufficient credible evidence—witness testimonies were inconsistent, the seized weapon's chain of custody was questionable, and no independent witness corroborated the alleged discovery. The firearm could not be conclusively proven to have been in the accused's possession or control at the time of seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case