Government of Gujarat vs RANMAL JIVAN JAM Advocate - S K BELA — 1414/2024

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: C.C. No. 1414/2024 Court Decision: The accused was acquitted of charges under Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a country-made firearm. The court found insufficient credible evidence—witness testimonies were inconsistent, the seized weapon's chain of custody was questionable, and no independent witness corroborated the alleged discovery. The firearm could not be conclusively proven to have been in the accused's possession or control at the time of seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 1414/2024