Government of Gujarat vs RANMAL JIVAN JAM Advocate - S K BELA — 1414/2024
Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B)A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW030016372024
Filing Number
1414/2024
Filing Date
07-11-2024
Registration No
1414/2024
Registration Date
07-11-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
30158
Police Station
KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RANMAL JIVAN JAM Advocate - S K BELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 04-12-2025 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1414/2024 Court Decision: The accused was acquitted of charges under Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a country-made firearm. The court found insufficient credible evidence—witness testimonies were inconsistent, the seized weapon's chain of custody was questionable, and no independent witness corroborated the alleged discovery. The firearm could not be conclusively proven to have been in the accused's possession or control at the time of seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C. No. 1414/2024 Court Decision: The accused was acquitted of charges under Arms Act Section 25(1-B) for illegal possession of a country-made firearm. The court found insufficient credible evidence—witness testimonies were inconsistent, the seized weapon's chain of custody was questionable, and no independent witness corroborated the alleged discovery. The firearm could not be conclusively proven to have been in the accused's possession or control at the time of seizure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts