Government of Gujarat vs AVADABHAI ARAJANBHAI ODEDARA Advocate - R L VAGHELA — 1021/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(a),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW030011342025
Filing Number
1021/2025
Filing Date
29-07-2025
Registration No
1021/2025
Registration Date
29-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
50494
Police Station
KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AVADABHAI ARAJANBHAI ODEDARA Advocate - R L VAGHELA
ARAJANBHAI LAKHABHAI ODEDARA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
LILUBEN W/O ARAJANBHAI LAKHABHAI ODEDARA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
BHAVANABEN D/O ARAJANBHAI LAKHABHAI ODEDARA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No.1021/2025 The court acquitted the four accused under IPC Section 498(A) (cruelty by husband/in-laws) due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged the accused caused her physical and mental suffering through dowry demands and abuse, investigation revealed no credible corroborating evidence. Medical records, witness testimonies, and the complainant's own statement contained significant inconsistencies. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.No.1021/2025 The court acquitted the four accused under IPC Section 498(A) (cruelty by husband/in-laws) due to insufficient evidence. While the complainant alleged the accused caused her physical and mental suffering through dowry demands and abuse, investigation revealed no credible corroborating evidence. Medical records, witness testimonies, and the complainant's own statement contained significant inconsistencies. The court found the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts