GITABEN JAYASUKH RATHOD vs JAYASUKH MEGHA RATHOD Advocate - S K BELA — 55/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJDW030005192024
Filing Number
55/2024
Filing Date
19-03-2024
Registration No
55/2024
Registration Date
19-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GITABEN JAYASUKH RATHOD
Adv. N J GHEDIYA
Respondent(s)
JAYASUKH MEGHA RATHOD Advocate - S K BELA
MEGHA SIDA RATHOD
Adv. S K BELA
SOMIBEN MEGHA RATHOD
Adv. S K BELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 55/2024 Decision: The court disposed of the case by ordering dismissal as settled. The parties to the dispute under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (sections 12, 18, 19, 22, 23) reached a settlement, and the petitioner withdrew further proceedings, rendering continuation unnecessary. Key Reasoning: Since the matter was amicably resolved between the parties, there was no justiciable issue remaining to be adjudicated, warranting case dismissal with cost implications as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 55/2024 Decision: The court disposed of the case by ordering dismissal as settled. The parties to the dispute under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (sections 12, 18, 19, 22, 23) reached a settlement, and the petitioner withdrew further proceedings, rendering continuation unnecessary. Key Reasoning: Since the matter was amicably resolved between the parties, there was no justiciable issue remaining to be adjudicated, warranting case dismissal with cost implications as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts