GITABEN JAYASUKH RATHOD vs JAYASUKH MEGHA RATHOD Advocate - S K BELA — 55/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,22,23. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJDW030005192024
Filing Number
55/2024
Filing Date
19-Mar-2024
Registration No
55/2024
Registration Date
19-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALA
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GITABEN JAYASUKH RATHOD
Adv. N J GHEDIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAYASUKH MEGHA RATHOD Advocate - S K BELA
-
2.MEGHA SIDA RATHOD
Adv. S K BELA
-
3.SOMIBEN MEGHA RATHOD
Adv. S K BELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 55/2024 Decision: The court disposed of the case by ordering dismissal as settled. The parties to the dispute under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (sections 12, 18, 19, 22, 23) reached a settlement, and the petitioner withdrew further proceedings, rendering continuation unnecessary. Key Reasoning: Since the matter was amicably resolved between the parties, there was no justiciable issue remaining to be adjudicated, warranting case dismissal with cost implications as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Oct-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Oct-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jul-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2024
Case Summary: 55/2024 Decision: The court disposed of the case by ordering dismissal as settled. The parties to the dispute under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (sections 12, 18, 19, 22, 23) reached a settlement, and the petitioner withdrew further proceedings, rendering continuation unnecessary. Key Reasoning: Since the matter was amicably resolved between the parties, there was no justiciable issue remaining to be adjudicated, warranting case dismissal with cost implications as applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts