Government of Gujarat vs HAJABHAI ALIAS HATHIYO RANAMALBHAI MODHAVADIYA Advocate - R L VAGHELA — 346/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(1),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 17th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW030003872025
Filing Number
346/2025
Filing Date
11-03-2025
Registration No
346/2025
Registration Date
11-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
41331
Police Station
KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HAJABHAI ALIAS HATHIYO RANAMALBHAI MODHAVADIYA Advocate - R L VAGHELA
PARABATBHAI VASTABHAI MODHAVADIYA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
MILANBHAI PARABATBHAI MODHAVADIYA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
HAMIRBHAI KARASHANBHAI MODHAVADIYA
Adv. R L VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 12-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No.346/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Hajabhai, Parabatbhai, Milanbhai, and Hamirrbhai Modhavadiya) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 354, and 135(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, lack of independent witness corroboration, and major discrepancies in witness testimonies that undermined the case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.No.346/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all four accused persons (Hajabhai, Parabatbhai, Milanbhai, and Hamirrbhai Modhavadiya) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 118(1), 352, 354, and 135(1) of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, lack of independent witness corroboration, and major discrepancies in witness testimonies that undermined the case credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts