THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGA ARSHI KARAVADARA Advocate - R.L.VAGHELA — 163/2015
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 4,5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW030002722015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
163/2015
Filing Date
07-04-2015
Registration No
163/2015
Registration Date
07-04-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
88
Police Station
KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NAGA ARSHI KARAVADARA Advocate - R.L.VAGHELA
SAHID HUSAIN VASA
Adv. R V VAN
DEVDAS RAJSHI ODEDARA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
HITESH NAROTAM GOHIL, DHOBI
Adv. R V VAN
PARBAT KESHU PARMAR(Abated)
VIKRAM NAGA PARMAR
BHARAT BHIMA BHUTIYA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
VIRAM VASTA CHUNDAVADARA(Abated)
KUNJAN HAMIR DATI, GADHAVI(Abated)
RAM MASHARI KADEGIYA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
RANMAL LAKHA ODEDARA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
VIJAY JENTILAL BHATT
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
JAYESH DEVA DANTI, GADHAVI
Adv. S.N.GOSWAMI
DUDA DEVA KHUNTI
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
NAGA HAJA RATIYA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
BHIMA SAMALA KHUTI
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
ASHOK DEVSHI MODHVADIYA
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
RAM SHAMALA KHUTI
Adv. S N GOSWAMI
LAKHA @ LAKHAN RAJA @ POLA ODEDARA
Adv. R.L.VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kalyampur acquitted all accused persons under IPC Section 4,5 (punishment for criminal intimidation and extortion) in Case C.C.No. 163/2015, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court noted that panch witness testimony is desirable, it recognized that credible independent evidence can establish guilt even without panch support; however, in this case, the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without corroborating independent evidence, making the case insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kalyampur acquitted all accused persons under IPC Section 4,5 (punishment for criminal intimidation and extortion) in Case C.C.No. 163/2015, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court noted that panch witness testimony is desirable, it recognized that credible independent evidence can establish guilt even without panch support; however, in this case, the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without corroborating independent evidence, making the case insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts