THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAGA ARSHI KARAVADARA Advocate - R.L.VAGHELA — 163/2015

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 4,5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW030002722015

Filing Number

163/2015

Filing Date

07-Apr-2015

Registration No

163/2015

Registration Date

07-Apr-2015

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 4,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAGA ARSHI KARAVADARA Advocate - R.L.VAGHELA

  2. 2.SAHID HUSAIN VASA

    Adv. R V VAN

  3. 3.DEVDAS RAJSHI ODEDARA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  4. 4.HITESH NAROTAM GOHIL, DHOBI

    Adv. R V VAN

  5. 5.PARBAT KESHU PARMAR(Abated)

  6. 6.VIKRAM NAGA PARMAR

  7. 7.BHARAT BHIMA BHUTIYA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  8. 8.VIRAM VASTA CHUNDAVADARA(Abated)

  9. 9.KUNJAN HAMIR DATI, GADHAVI(Abated)

  10. 10.RAM MASHARI KADEGIYA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  11. 11.RANMAL LAKHA ODEDARA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  12. 12.VIJAY JENTILAL BHATT

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  13. 13.JAYESH DEVA DANTI, GADHAVI

    Adv. S.N.GOSWAMI

  14. 14.DUDA DEVA KHUNTI

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  15. 15.NAGA HAJA RATIYA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  16. 16.BHIMA SAMALA KHUTI

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  17. 17.ASHOK DEVSHI MODHVADIYA

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  18. 18.RAM SHAMALA KHUTI

    Adv. S N GOSWAMI

  19. 19.LAKHA @ LAKHAN RAJA @ POLA ODEDARA

    Adv. R.L.VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kalyampur acquitted all accused persons under IPC Section 4,5 (punishment for criminal intimidation and extortion) in Case C.C.No. 163/2015, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court noted that panch witness testimony is desirable, it recognized that credible independent evidence can establish guilt even without panch support; however, in this case, the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without corroborating independent evidence, making the case insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 19-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 21-Apr-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-Mar-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 31-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 18-Jan-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 30-Dec-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 13-Nov-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Sep-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 05-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 05-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 08-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 03-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 06-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 31-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 27-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 22-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 04-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 01-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 28-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 30-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 02-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 21-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 10-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 06-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 04-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 05-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 17-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 12-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 25-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 13-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 25-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 02-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 05-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 01-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 06-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 25-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 25-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 19-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 08-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 15-Jan-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 02-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 21-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 03-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 29-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 23-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 19-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 18-Apr-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 09-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 20-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 28-Jan-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 23-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 11-Nov-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 09-Oct-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 04-Sep-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 01-Aug-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 01-Jul-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 30-Apr-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 19-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 14-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  77. 03-Jan-2019

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  78. 27-Nov-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  79. 08-Oct-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  80. 04-Oct-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  81. 09-Aug-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  82. 09-Jul-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  83. 16-Apr-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  84. 12-Feb-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  85. 26-Dec-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  86. 25-Oct-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  87. 29-Aug-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  88. 18-Jul-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  89. 18-Apr-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  90. 19-Jan-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  91. 18-Oct-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  92. 19-Jul-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  93. 13-Apr-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  94. 12-Jan-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  95. 08-Oct-2015

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  96. 12-Jun-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  97. 07-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class in Kalyampur acquitted all accused persons under IPC Section 4,5 (punishment for criminal intimidation and extortion) in Case C.C.No. 163/2015, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the court noted that panch witness testimony is desirable, it recognized that credible independent evidence can establish guilt even without panch support; however, in this case, the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without corroborating independent evidence, making the case insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case