SHOBHANABEN VALLABHADAS MODHA,W.O. DHIRENDRA JOSHI, PROP.MA LIRBAIKRUPA PETROLIUM vs RAJUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI ODEDARA Advocate - V A CHAUHAN — 60/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,144. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW030000722026

Filing Number

60/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KALYANPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALA

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KALYANPUR POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOBHANABEN VALLABHADAS MODHA,W.O. DHIRENDRA JOSHI, PROP.MA LIRBAIKRUPA PETROLIUM

    Adv. M B BHOGAYATA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI ODEDARA Advocate - V A CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the case after the petitioner and respondent reached a settlement. The court noted that during the pendency of proceedings, the parties agreed to resolve their dispute, and the petitioner withdrew their request to continue the case, resulting in the respondent being acquitted and the case being closed with costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 60/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case after the petitioner and respondent reached a settlement. The court noted that during the pendency of proceedings, the parties agreed to resolve their dispute, and the petitioner withdrew their request to continue the case, resulting in the respondent being acquitted and the case being closed with costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case