PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED vs AEMNABEN AAMADBHAI GAJAN Advocate - D V KANABAR — 155/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW020044392025

Filing Number

155/2025

Filing Date

29-Dec-2025

Registration No

155/2025

Registration Date

29-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALA

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. K D VADGAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AEMNABEN AAMADBHAI GAJAN Advocate - D V KANABAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court dismissed Paswim Gujarat Vij Company Limited's petition on procedural grounds, finding that the petitioner failed to establish jurisdiction under Section 11 of the relevant statute. The court ordered refund of court fees and directed the petition to be rejected as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Paswim Gujarat Vij Company Limited's petition on procedural grounds, finding that the petitioner failed to establish jurisdiction under Section 11 of the relevant statute. The court ordered refund of court fees and directed the petition to be rejected as per applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case