Government of Gujarat vs ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI VADHIYARA — 3153/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020043722025
Filing Number
3153/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
3153/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251412
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANILBHAI RAMESHBHAI VADHIYARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.3153/2025 The court convicted Anilbhai Rameshbhai Vadhiyara under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendments. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted a plea for leniency, citing sufficient and reasonable grounds for reduced punishment to help rehabilitation. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹300 (or three months simple imprisonment in default), considering his confession, mitigating circumstances, and the principles established in prior case law allowing discretion to impose minimum sentences below statutory maximums when warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3153/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.3153/2025 The court convicted Anilbhai Rameshbhai Vadhiyara under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendments. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted a plea for leniency, citing sufficient and reasonable grounds for reduced punishment to help rehabilitation. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of ₹300 (or three months simple imprisonment in default), considering his confession, mitigating circumstances, and the principles established in prior case law allowing discretion to impose minimum sentences below statutory maximums when warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts