Government of Gujarat vs AELIYAS IBRAHIM KACHHI — 3138/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020043452025
Filing Number
3138/2025
Filing Date
16-Dec-2025
Registration No
3138/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185007250308
Police Station
SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AELIYAS IBRAHIM KACHHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted respondent Aeliyas Ibrahim Kachhi under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs. 150. However, considering the respondent's circumstances and background, the court exercised discretion to impose a lesser sentence under Section 275 IPC—reducing the sentence to simple imprisonment for one day in lieu of the original sentence, provided the respondent pays the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3138/2025
The court convicted respondent Aeliyas Ibrahim Kachhi under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs. 150. However, considering the respondent's circumstances and background, the court exercised discretion to impose a lesser sentence under Section 275 IPC—reducing the sentence to simple imprisonment for one day in lieu of the original sentence, provided the respondent pays the fine. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts