Government of Gujarat vs SHYAM BHIKHUSINH RATHOD Advocate - N A MUNDRA, R B GOJIYA — 3307/2024
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020042902024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3307/2024
Filing Date
31-12-2024
Registration No
3307/2024
Registration Date
31-12-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
11994005240071
Police Station
RAILWAY POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHYAM BHIKHUSINH RATHOD Advocate - N A MUNDRA, R B GOJIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 20-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Shyam Bikhusingh Rathod, of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2). The court found insufficient evidence that the accused stole a mobile phone and cash from the complainant's mother during a train journey on November 30, 2024, as the circumstantial evidence and witness testimonies did not conclusively establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court granted the accused benefit of doubt and ordered his release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Shyam Bikhusingh Rathod, of theft charges under IPC Section 303(2). The court found insufficient evidence that the accused stole a mobile phone and cash from the complainant's mother during a train journey on November 30, 2024, as the circumstantial evidence and witness testimonies did not conclusively establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court granted the accused benefit of doubt and ordered his release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts