Government of Gujarat vs MAHEBUB JUNAS SUMBHANIYA — 2826/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020039692025
Filing Number
2826/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
2826/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250339
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHEBUB JUNAS SUMBHANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted Mahebub Junas Sumbhaniya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for one day and a fine of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty), considering his circumstances and rehabilitation prospects as mitigating factors warranting reduced punishment below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2826/2025
The court convicted Mahebub Junas Sumbhaniya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for one day and a fine of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty), considering his circumstances and rehabilitation prospects as mitigating factors warranting reduced punishment below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts