Government of Gujarat vs DHARNAT ALIAS BHUTO NARAN CHAVDA — 2818/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020039532025
Filing Number
2818/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
2818/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251200
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHARNAT ALIAS BHUTO NARAN CHAVDA
MAHESH BHIMSIBHAI CHAVDA
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 09-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 11-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary - C.C.NO-2818-2025 The court convicted Dharnat alias Bhuto Naran Chavda and Mahesh Bhimsibhai Chavda under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of confectionery) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors—both accused being first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds with family responsibilities—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine each instead of the statutory minimum, along with 5-day simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The seized confectionery articles were forfeited to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - C.C.NO-2818-2025 The court convicted Dharnat alias Bhuto Naran Chavda and Mahesh Bhimsibhai Chavda under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of confectionery) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors—both accused being first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds with family responsibilities—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine each instead of the statutory minimum, along with 5-day simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The seized confectionery articles were forfeited to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts