Government of Gujarat vs DHARNAT ALIAS BHUTO NARAN CHAVDA — 2818/2025

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020039532025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2818/2025

Filing Date

27-11-2025

Registration No

2818/2025

Registration Date

27-11-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251200

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DHARNAT ALIAS BHUTO NARAN CHAVDA

MAHESH BHIMSIBHAI CHAVDA

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

19-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

11-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary - C.C.NO-2818-2025 The court convicted Dharnat alias Bhuto Naran Chavda and Mahesh Bhimsibhai Chavda under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of confectionery) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors—both accused being first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds with family responsibilities—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine each instead of the statutory minimum, along with 5-day simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The seized confectionery articles were forfeited to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - C.C.NO-2818-2025 The court convicted Dharnat alias Bhuto Naran Chavda and Mahesh Bhimsibhai Chavda under IPC Section 275 (adulteration of confectionery) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime. Considering mitigating factors—both accused being first-time offenders from economically disadvantaged backgrounds with family responsibilities—the court imposed a reduced sentence of Rs. 300 fine each instead of the statutory minimum, along with 5-day simple imprisonment if fines remain unpaid. The seized confectionery articles were forfeited to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case