Government of Gujarat vs DEV BHIKHUBHAI VAGHELA — 2800/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-b. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020039302025
Filing Number
2800/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
2800/2025
Registration Date
26-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004250972
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEV BHIKHUBHAI VAGHELA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.2800/2025 The Gujarat High Court convicted Dev Bhikhubhai Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and its 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for illicit liquor possession and sale. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of one year and a fine of ₹150 (or one day additional imprisonment in default), finding sufficient and justifiable reasons to impose the minimum prescribed punishment considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2800/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.2800/2025 The Gujarat High Court convicted Dev Bhikhubhai Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and its 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for illicit liquor possession and sale. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of one year and a fine of ₹150 (or one day additional imprisonment in default), finding sufficient and justifiable reasons to impose the minimum prescribed punishment considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts