Government of Gujarat vs RAJENDRASINH ALIAS RAJU PANCHANJI CHAUHAN — 2796/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-a-a,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020039262025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2796/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
2796/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004250960
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRASINH ALIAS RAJU PANCHANJI CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 01-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Rajendrasinh Umedrasinh Chaudhary of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f), finding insufficient evidence as the prosecution failed to establish the recovery of contraband liquor through credible witness testimony and proper documentation. The court held that the panchnama (official record) was not properly constituted, the neutral witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Rajendrasinh Umedrasinh Chaudhary of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f), finding insufficient evidence as the prosecution failed to establish the recovery of contraband liquor through credible witness testimony and proper documentation. The court held that the panchnama (official record) was not properly constituted, the neutral witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent sources. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts