Government of Gujarat vs KHIMANAND AJABHAI MOVAR — 2793/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-a-a. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020039232025

Filing Number

2793/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

2793/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251074

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-a-a

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHIMANAND AJABHAI MOVAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(e)), finding insufficient evidence that he possessed country-made liquor without proper authorization. The prosecution failed to establish its case as the panchayat memo was unreliable and independent witnesses could not corroborate the seizure, while the court granted benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2793/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65(e)), finding insufficient evidence that he possessed country-made liquor without proper authorization. The prosecution failed to establish its case as the panchayat memo was unreliable and independent witnesses could not corroborate the seizure, while the court granted benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case