Government of Gujarat vs RASIK MEGHNATH GOSWAMI — 2727/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020038462025
Filing Number
2727/2025
Filing Date
21-Nov-2025
Registration No
2727/2025
Registration Date
21-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004250536
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RASIK MEGHNATH GOSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.2727/2025 The court convicted respondent Rasik Meghnath Goswami under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016 for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of one day (rigorous) and imposed a fine of ₹150 (or one day additional imprisonment in default), while exercising discretion to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2727/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.2727/2025 The court convicted respondent Rasik Meghnath Goswami under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments of 2016 for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of one day (rigorous) and imposed a fine of ₹150 (or one day additional imprisonment in default), while exercising discretion to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts