Government of Gujarat vs RAHUL ALIAS RAMESH GOPAL DHARANI Advocate - V B JAM — 2699/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-a-a. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020038122025
Filing Number
2699/2025
Filing Date
19-Nov-2025
Registration No
2699/2025
Registration Date
19-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251385
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAHUL ALIAS RAMESH GOPAL DHARANI Advocate - V B JAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Gujarati court judgment acquits the accused Ramesh Udey Rahulbhai Gopalbhai Dharani in a case involving possession of foreign liquor (Prohibition Act Section 65) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses failed to provide credible corroboration, the panchnama (official record) lacked proper authentication, and the accusation was not substantiated by independent witnesses, thereby benefiting from the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2699/2025
Summary The Gujarati court judgment acquits the accused Ramesh Udey Rahulbhai Gopalbhai Dharani in a case involving possession of foreign liquor (Prohibition Act Section 65) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution witnesses failed to provide credible corroboration, the panchnama (official record) lacked proper authentication, and the accusation was not substantiated by independent witnesses, thereby benefiting from the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts