Government of Gujarat vs MERAMAN ARJAN KARMUR — 2670/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020037752025

Filing Number

2670/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

2670/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004251616

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MERAMAN ARJAN KARMUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case CC.No.2670/2025 The court convicted the respondent, Meraman Arjan Karmur, under Section 56(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments-2016 for illegal possession of liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering his circumstances and the principle that adequate and reasonable grounds warrant lenient sentencing, imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2670/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC.No.2670/2025 The court convicted the respondent, Meraman Arjan Karmur, under Section 56(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments-2016 for illegal possession of liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering his circumstances and the principle that adequate and reasonable grounds warrant lenient sentencing, imposed a fine of Rs. 150 (one hundred fifty rupees) instead of the statutory minimum punishment, with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case