Government of Gujarat vs BHANABHAI VELJIBHAI CHUDASAMA — 2625/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020037082025
Filing Number
2625/2025
Filing Date
13-Nov-2025
Registration No
2625/2025
Registration Date
13-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251570
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHANABHAI VELJIBHAI CHUDASAMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.2625/2025 The court convicted Bhanabhai Veljibhai Chudasama under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment (IPC) for unlawful possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the guilt and filed a petition for lighter sentencing; the court, noting sufficient and reasonable grounds for leniency, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹300 fine instead of maximum punishment, allowing the accused opportunity for rehabilitation and social reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2625/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.2625/2025 The court convicted Bhanabhai Veljibhai Chudasama under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment (IPC) for unlawful possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the guilt and filed a petition for lighter sentencing; the court, noting sufficient and reasonable grounds for leniency, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹300 fine instead of maximum punishment, allowing the accused opportunity for rehabilitation and social reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts