Government of Gujarat vs AJAY NARASHIBHAI SALANI — 2583/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020036342025
Filing Number
2583/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
2583/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251423
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAY NARASHIBHAI SALANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.2583/2025 The court convicted respondent Ajay Narashibhai Salani under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 65 (A.P.), for illicit liquor possession. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and filed for reduced sentencing. Considering sufficient and special reasons including the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential, the court imposed a fine of ₹300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the mandatory minimum sentence, upholding principles of judicial discretion for lenient punishment where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2583/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.2583/2025 The court convicted respondent Ajay Narashibhai Salani under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 65 (A.P.), for illicit liquor possession. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and filed for reduced sentencing. Considering sufficient and special reasons including the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential, the court imposed a fine of ₹300 (with 2 days simple imprisonment as default) instead of the mandatory minimum sentence, upholding principles of judicial discretion for lenient punishment where justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts