Government of Gujarat vs KARU DEVAKARANBHAI PARESHA — 2500/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020035002025
Filing Number
2500/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
2500/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250303
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARU DEVAKARANBHAI PARESHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the respondent, Karu Devakaranbhai Paresha, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and its 2016 amendments (Section 65 IPC), finding him guilty of illicit liquor possession and sale. The court imposed a fine of ₹300 (three hundred rupees) and sentenced him to simple imprisonment for two days, considering his circumstances and applying principles of proportionate sentencing while maintaining social order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2500/2025
The court convicted the respondent, Karu Devakaranbhai Paresha, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and its 2016 amendments (Section 65 IPC), finding him guilty of illicit liquor possession and sale. The court imposed a fine of ₹300 (three hundred rupees) and sentenced him to simple imprisonment for two days, considering his circumstances and applying principles of proportionate sentencing while maintaining social order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts